Rooting for a losing team is like being stuck in a bad relationship. You try to leave; I mean, you really try to leave, but as soon as the circumstances seem just right they surprise you by returning a fumble for a touchdown on the first play of the season. And just as you've leaped off the couch, as your entire body reaches blissful weightlessness, you realize that you'll never leave them. You can't.
You hate them, but they leave you wanting more. Like that one perfect golf shot among 54 piss poor ones, certain stats stick in the back of your mind. 'At least they owned the National League this year' ... 'Leading the league in grand slams is really promising.'
But they can never put it all together at just the right time to utter those three magic words you crave. 'Bases loaded single.' At points, they're simply incredible. Briefly, just for one play, they're the best outfielders in baseball playoff history. But then you come crashing down and realize that you're in for another 5 months of no communication, then a long brutal slog through the dog days.
That's why FOX's new Tommy Lasorda ad campaign is an insult to true fans. By trying to guilt us in to rooting for baseball, not for our teams, it completely ignores the true relationship between a fan and his chosen ballclub. Who in their right minds would go through a seven month, hellish relationship (only to be broken up with the day before the prom) and then drive to the goddam prom to vote for the King and Queen.
It's the most basic of principles. The last thing an unhappy couple want to see is, clearly, a happy one. Not only that, the ads target those people who are not only in mildly dysfunctional, but downright abusive ones. The Indians? The Cubs?! In sports terms (which in no way reflects the real-world accuracy of this analogy) that's like saying, Why don't you go get thrown down the stairs for seven months then come over to my house and watch me f*ck the prom queen.
Screw that and screw FOX for that campaign.
Here's to October 2007, when the Mets will await the winner of the Boston-Cleveland ALCS. Next year will be different, I swear. They're getting better, really, next year will be different.
Friday, October 20, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
What's this new ad campaign that you are talking about? I watched the game last night, did I miss something?
Haha, I like the prom analogy...
Damn the freakin' Cardinals, they're the new millenium's version of the 1990's Atlanta Braves. They'll always find a way to win their division, no matter how unimpressive it might look, but then they'll reach the World Series and predictably lay down and die (I say it's a 5-game series at most). Mets-Tigers would've been a fun series. Instead, I'm hearing ESPN "analysts" talk about how Scott Rolen (with an injured left shoulder) should be batting behind Pujols because (although he didn't have a lot of great hits in the past couple of games) he took some nice cuts at the ball... I mean when Jeff Weaver is one of the top 3 pitchers in your starting rotation, you should just be disqualified... with all that said, I don't know much about baseball and I expect Lim to refute my Braves comparison
Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves right now. The past 3 seasons the Cardinals have won their division, but in 2003 they didn't even make the playoffs, so I wouldn't compare them to the Braves just yet. In a few years that could totally change, but they still have a long way to go.
Also the Cardinals could very easily give the Tigers a run for their money. If the pitching for Cardinals continues to be as good as its been anything can happen. I mean they managed to shut down the most potent offense in the NL (if not in the entire league). Don't get me wrong I'm rooting for the Tigers, usually I like to root for the NL team, but I'll make an exception this year. Also I own a Detroit hat so if they win I can say I've been a fan for the past couple of years, well atleast since I first got the hat.
I'm just hoping for a good series that's all.
Post a Comment